Earlier this season, I was in the camp of critical observers of Tressel's offensive strategy and Pryor's inability to read defenses. After the Purdue game, I was highly critical of OSU's offense - not just this season, but every season under Tressel. My primary criticism was based on the Tressel's outward resistance/apathy toward having a top 10 offense to go along with the top ten defense each year. How many championships have been lost because the offense could not deliver in big games? Several.
As expected the win against Oregon in the Rose Bowl has temporarily silenced the critics. Tressel's pass first approach was not expected by anyone, especially Oregon. The Senator gave the pupil a good lesson in football...balance wins games. OSU had offense and defense. Oregon had little of either. If not for special teams play, Oregon may have not scored.
Maybe the Rose Bowl game reflects Tressel's ability to bend his offensive philosophy. The defensive side of the ball made the change three years ago, and has been paying dividends for two seasons. Compared to 2007, OSU's co-defensive coordinator's Heacock and Fickel, have shown a fantastic ability to adjust to the current spread/no huddle offenses. The spread offense is no longer a thorn in OSU's side. The coaching staff has recruited faster players who close the gaps much quicker. If Tressel has made a change on the offensive side of the ball, 2010 will be a special season.
Recent Comments